BAA Lunar Section
Dedicated to amateur research and observation of the Moon
The Moon: Notes and Records of the BAA Lunar Section
The New Moon journal (1983-2010)
Topographical
studies
By
Peter Grego
Introduction
For
a number of very good reasons a great deal of emphasis is placed on
the importance of sketching the lunar surface. Until the advent of
photography in the latter half of the 19th Century, drawing at the
eyepiece was the only means of recording the Moon's features.
Professional astronomers interested in researching the Moon haven't
needed to peer through telescope eyepieces armed with a pencil and
sketchpad for more than a century. Now, the topography of the Moon's
surface — both near-side, far-side and its polar regions —
has been mapped in great detail, and the composition of its surface
is well known. These days, few professional observatories ever turn
their big telescopes towards the Moon — other than to impress
new students or to test out new equipment.
Visual
lunar observation is entirely the province of the amateur
astronomer. Just seeing the Moon's surface through the telescope and
being able to locate and identify the main lunar features is
satisfying enough for many people who enjoy looking at the Moon. But
many lunar observers want to take their enjoyment of the Moon a step
further by making their own permanent record of their forays around
the Moon's surface.
The
continuing importance of visual studies
It
may be asked what possible reason is there to draw the Moon's
features, in view of the fact that digicams, camcorders, webcams and
dedicated astronomical CCD cameras are capable of securing detailed
images of the Moon, recording features that the visual observer would
find impossible to draw with any degree of accuracy — so, why
bother? Surely, the lunar surface appears so detailed, even through a
small telescope, that only an expert artist could hope to accurately
draw even a small section of it? What is the point, when CCD cameras
can do it all effortlessly in a fraction of the time? Why bother to
draw or even image the Moon through a backyard telescope, when the
entire lunar surface has already been mapped in exquisite detail?
Such arguments are among those used nowadays to dismiss the efforts of the observer who sketches the Moon's features — and, for that matter, anyone who dares make an observational drawing of any other celestial object. These arguments completely miss the point of why many lunar observers choose to draw the Moon's surface.
Learning
how to draw the Moon's features is an activity that has the
potential to improve every single aspect of the amateur astronomer's
skills of observation. With its hundreds of craters and mountains and
vast grey plains, the lunar surface can appear utterly confusing to a
novice, but it becomes increasingly familiar over time. Novices are
often amazed at how the effects of illumination vary with the
distance from the terminator — craters look incredibly deep near
the terminator, but a little distance from it they may not look so
cavernous. At first, the observer, armed with a map, may struggle to
correlate the view through the telescope eyepiece with the major
features marked on a map. But, as the major landmarks are noted, they
can be used as stepping stones to hop across to other, more subtle
features that may have originally been overlooked. Without exception,
an observer's ability to discern the fine detail on the Moon will
improve in proportion to the amount of time that is spent studying
the lunar surface through the telescope eyepiece.
Just
studying the Moon through the eyepiece with the aid of a map,
photographs and/or a written description hones the skills of
observing and is a continual learning experience. But one certain
means of fine tuning one's skills of observation that goes hand in
hand with learning one's way around the Moon, is to spend time
drawing individual features or small groups of features. By paying
full attention to a small area of the Moon, instead of allowing the
eye to roam around the lunar surface, the brain begins to make sense
out of the light and shade, teasing fine topographic detail from what
may have initially looked like a plain hole in the ground. It is
remarkable how much more detail can be discerned when the observer
has the task of attempting to draw a single small feature as
accurately as possible.
Drawing the Moon — tips and techniques
Observer's map of the Moon in 16 sections, by Peter Grego
Observational
information
Finished
observational drawings should ideally be accompanied by more than
just the basic information of the feature name, date and instrument
used. A complete observation may include some or all of the following details:
Name
of feature(s). IAU
(International Astronomical Union) official names of features should
invariably be used. Many older atlases may contain errors of
nomenclature or outmoded and unofficial designations for features.
Pickering, for example, was a name once unofficially given to Messier
A in Mare Fecunditatis. However, the 'official' IAU crater Pickering
is a different crater, located near the centre of the Moon's disk. If
the feature that was observed cannot be identified with an official
IAU designation, note its location in relation several of the nearest
named features, eg., 'small group of low hills in Mare Frigoris,
immediately west of Harpalus'.
Date
and time. Amateur
astronomers around the world use UT (Universal Time), which is the
same as GMT (Greenwich Mean Time). Observers need be aware of the
time difference introduced by the world time zone in which they
reside and any local daylight savings adjustments to the time, and
convert this to UT accordingly - the date should be adjusted too.
Times are usually given in terms of a 24-hour clock - for example,
3.25 pm UT can be written as either 15:25, 1525 or 15h 25m UT.
Seeing. To estimate the quality of astronomical seeing, astronomers refer to one of two scales of seeing. In the UK, many observers use the Antoniadi Scale, devised specifically for lunar and planetary observers.
AI - Perfect seeing, without a quiver. Maximum magnification can be used if desired.
AII - Good seeing. Slight undulations, with moments of calm lasting several seconds.
AIII - Moderate seeing, with large atmospheric tremors.
AIV - Poor seeing, with constant troublesome undulations.
AV - Very bad seeing. Image extremely unstable, hardly worth attempting to observe lunar surface features.
In the United States, seeing is often measured from 1 to 10 on the Pickering Scale. The scale was devised according to the appearance of a highly magnified star and its surrounding Airy pattern through a small refractor. The Airy pattern, an artefact introduced by optics, will distort according to the degree of atmospheric turbulence along its light path. Under perfect seeing conditions, stars look like a tiny bright point surrounded by a complete set of perfect rings in constant view. Of course, most lunar observers don't check the Airy pattern of stars each time they estimate the quality of seeing during an observing session — an estimate is made, based on the steadiness of the lunar image.
P1 - Terrible seeing. Star image is usually about twice the diameter of the third diffraction ring (if the ring could be seen).
P2 - Extremely poor seeing. Image occasionally twice the diameter of the third ring.
P3 - Very poor seeing. Image about the same diameter as the third ring and brighter at the centre.
P4 - Poor seeing. The central disk often visible; arcs of diffraction rings sometimes seen.
P5 - Moderate seeing. Disk always visible; arcs frequently seen.
P6 - Moderate to good seeing. Disk always visible; short arcs constantly seen.
P7 - Good seeing. Disk sometimes sharply defined; rings seen as long arcs or complete circles.
P8 - Very good seeing. Disk always sharply defined; rings as long arcs or complete but in motion.
P9 - Excellent seeing. Inner ring stationary. Outer rings momentarily stationary.
P10 - Perfect seeing. Complete diffraction pattern is stationary.
Considerable
confusion can be caused if a simple figure is used to estimate
seeing, without indicating whether it's made on the Antoniadi or
Pickering scale. So, in addition to designating the seeing with a
letter and a figure (AI to V or P1 to 10), a brief written
description of seeing, such as 'AII - Good with occasional moments of
excellent seeing' can be made.
Conditions.
An
indication of the prevailing weather conditions, such as the amount
of cloud cover, the degree and direction of wind and the temperature.
Transparency.
More
relevant to deep sky observers than lunar observers, the quality of
atmospheric clarity is known as transparency. Transparency varies
according to the amount of smoke and dust particles in the
atmosphere, along with cloud and haze. Industrial and domestic
pollution causes transparency to be worse in and around cities. A
transparency scale of 1 to 6 is often used, according to the
magnitude of the faintest star detectable with the unaided eye. Some
lunar observers choose to include a measure of transparency for the
sake of completeness.
Age
and phase. An
average lunar month, or lunation, lasts 29d 12h 44m, from one new
Moon to the next. Many observers choose to note the time elapsed from
that lunation's new Moon, in days and hours, to the time of the
observation. The age of the Moon may be used to estimate the
approximate phase of the Moon at the time of observation. The Moon's
phase can also be indicated by a short note, such as 'waxing gibbous'
or 'waning crescent' for example. A more exact figure to gauge the
Moon's phase is a figure denoting the percentage of the near-side
that appears illuminated — for example, at first quarter phase,
the Moon is 50 percent illuminated (waxing); at last quarter it is 50
percent illuminated (waning).
Libration.
Combined, the effects of libration in latitude and longitude cause a
displacement of the Moon's mean centre. Features on the Moon's mean
far-side are brought onto the Earth-turned lunar hemisphere on one
limb, while features move onto the hemisphere facing away from the
Earth on the opposite limb. At extremes, libration in latitude
amounts to ± 6.5°, while libration in longitude can be as
great as ±7.5°. These figures are useful to quote,
especially on observations of near-limb features in the libration zone.
Selenographic
coordinates. Coordinates
on the Moon are called selenographic coordinates. The mean centre of
the lunar disk is located at a selenographic latitude of 0° and
a selenographic longitude of 0°. Going northward, selenographic
latitude is positive, and negative going southward. The Moon's north
pole is located at a selenographic latitude of 90°, and the
south pole is at -90°. Selenographic longitude increases
eastwards from the Moon's mean central meridian. The mean eastern
limb is located at 90°, increasing eastward around the far side
to 180° at the point opposite the mean centre of the disk,
270° at the mean western limb, and 360° (0°) at the
mean centre of the disk. On maps, features either side of longitude
0° are often marked as positive (degrees east) or negative
(degrees west). A feature located at +45° (45°E)
corresponds to a selenographic longitude of 45°. A feature
located at -45° (45°W) corresponds to a selenographic
longitude of 315°. A feature's selenographic coordinates can be
indicated on the observational drawing.
Selenographic colongitude and the lunar terminator. If the Moon maintained a perfectly circular orbit around the Earth and did not undergo librations, it would present the same face towards the Earth — its morning and evening terminator would cross over the same features at exactly the same point in each and every lunation. But this is not the case, and libration has a considerable effect on the apparent position of features in relation to the terminator. For example, the eastern part of the large crater Ptolemaeus lies on the Moon's mean central meridian, at a selenographic longitude of 0°. Therefore, at a mean libration, Ptolemaeus appears on the sunrise terminator at precisely first quarter phase. However, at extremes of libration, Ptolemaeus can lie more than 3° east or west of the mean centre of the Moon, and it appearance on the terminator can be advanced by more than 12 hours prior to first quarter or retarded by more than 12 hours after first quarter phase.
In order to calculate precisely where the morning or evening terminator of the Moon lies, a figure called the Sun's selenographic colongitude is used. The Sun's selenographic colongitude is numerically equal to the selenographic longitude of the morning terminator — the figure is published in astronomical ephemerides and can be displayed on many lunar computer programs. At new Moon, the Sun's selenographic colongitude equals 270°, at first quarter 90°, full Moon 180° and last quarter 180°. To work out exactly where the near-side morning or evening terminator lies in relation to the actual selenographic longitude at the Moon's equator, the following table is used:
|
Phase New Moon to first quarter First quarter to full Moon Full Moon to last quarter Last querter to new Moon |
Terminator Morning Morning Evening Evening |
Sun's sel. colongitude (S) 270° to 360° 0° to 90° 90° to 180° 180° to 270° |
Longitude of terminator 360°-S West S East 180°-S West S-180° East |
The Sun's selenographic colongitude increases by approximately 0.5° per hour, or 12° per day.
Sun's selenographic latitude. Another figure that many lunar observers state on their observations is the Sun's selenographic latitude - this equals the Sun's selenographic latitude at the subsolar point, and varies between +1.5° and -1.5° over the course of around six months.
Lunation. The numbering of the Moon's lunations officially began with lunation 1 on 16 January 1923. Lunation 1,000 began on 25 October 2003. Many lunar observers include a lunation number on their observational reports.
Lunar data. Much of the necessary information about the Moon is published in annual astronomical ephemerides such as the Handbook of the British Astronomical Association, the Astronomical Almanac (a joint publication of the US Nautical Almanac Office and Her Majesty's Nautical Almanac Office in the UK) and the Multiyear Interactive Computer Almanac (MICA, published by the US Naval Observatory). Programs for personal computers are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and are capable of giving the user much more than a few dry figures. Many of the more advanced lunar programs are capable of displaying high resolution images or maps of the surface of the Moon, fully adjusted for phase and libration. It won't be long before personal computers are capable of running advanced programs that display detailed topographical 3-D models of the Moon's surface, adjusted for lighting and libration, that show all the features that can be discerned through a small telescope. Such a program could only help encourage amateur astronomers to take out their telescopes and view the Moon's splendours with their own eyes.